News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

Fran Barrett Michael Hickey government board leadership MAC AIDS Fund Randall Quan capacity building CRE News Alliance for Nonprofit Management harvard business school Rashid Littlejohn Governance as Leadership nonprofit ownership Fran's Corner Ximena Rua-Merkin community New York Community Trust fundraising Jean Lobell Data bookkeeping staff arts mergers accountability Valyrie Laedlein guest blogger publications record keeping grantmakers for effective organizations Nonprofit Sustainability nonprofit leaders nonprofit accountability What is Core? executive transition hard times Board of Directors cre case statement Pamela Dicent grantmakers leadership New York City Government board and staff relations Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative jobs President Obama Volunteers collaborations Nonprofit Tools Barbara Blumenthal nonprofit start-ups Rona Taylor Nonprofit Quarterly Useful Links Bill Ryan Needs Assessment Barbara Turk Featured Items Nonprofit News rockaways handling the unexpected media National and Community Service CRE Tips Albany New York IT 30th Anniversary Peter Block Harvard Kennedy School lower Manhattan tips Coaching Client News Government Updates foundations Philanthropic Collaborative Interns CRE Executive Search evaluation Daring to Lead HIV/AIDS services providers National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy CRE POV House Party strategic alliances civic engagement Mohan Sikka Sector Research Huffington Post HR Without HR RFP NYCCCOC Stanford Social Innovation Review Pavitra Menon queens Nonprofit Data Starved internal controls NYS Budget executive Beth Kobliner Advocacy Mark Light I.T. without I.T. United Way of NYC website, resources, announcements Government News Karen Erdos announcment Jeff Ballow New York Times Funding Updates Maria Mottola New York Foundation proposal writing generative Development Survey nonprofit mergers computers Hurricane Sandy Louisa Hackett nonprofit management Holly Delany Cole Ero Gray postponed event