News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

Government Updates Development Survey House Party RFP hard times Pamela Dicent accountability Daring to Lead Rashid Littlejohn Huffington Post Fran Barrett computers Governance as Leadership generative fundraising Nonprofit Sustainability website, resources, announcements HR Without HR Beth Kobliner Featured Items announcment executive strategic alliances cre Maria Mottola New York Foundation CRE News Jeff Ballow Holly Delany Cole nonprofit leaders nonprofit ownership CRE POV United Way of NYC I.T. without I.T. NYS Budget Funding Updates government Peter Block mergers New York Useful Links National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy President Obama grantmakers for effective organizations Stanford Social Innovation Review nonprofit management executive transition Rona Taylor rockaways bookkeeping Coaching Pavitra Menon Jean Lobell board leadership arts Albany Alliance for Nonprofit Management Michael Hickey Sector Research nonprofit mergers Advocacy nonprofit accountability CRE Executive Search Mark Light jobs Nonprofit Philanthropic Collaborative Barbara Turk National and Community Service Fran's Corner Louisa Hackett Data Starved Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative MAC AIDS Fund Data Randall Quan Needs Assessment Ximena Rua-Merkin Valyrie Laedlein New York Times IT media Nonprofit Quarterly evaluation HIV/AIDS services providers 30th Anniversary nonprofit start-ups tips handling the unexpected CRE Tips Bill Ryan civic engagement collaborations proposal writing queens Hurricane Sandy Harvard Kennedy School foundations Mohan Sikka Client News lower Manhattan capacity building publications guest blogger Government News Interns grantmakers New York Community Trust harvard business school Nonprofit Tools NYCCCOC case statement Ero Gray leadership staff New York City Government What is Core? board and staff relations Board of Directors Barbara Blumenthal community internal controls Volunteers postponed event Nonprofit News record keeping Karen Erdos