News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

internal controls What is Core? Nonprofit Quarterly Ximena Rua-Merkin Peter Block board leadership IT grantmakers for effective organizations Data Starved Fran's Corner Alliance for Nonprofit Management Nonprofit community nonprofit management RFP Daring to Lead grantmakers New York City Government Useful Links collaborations handling the unexpected Maria Mottola National and Community Service arts leadership Governance as Leadership evaluation jobs generative queens Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative MAC AIDS Fund Client News NYS Budget United Way of NYC Mark Light executive transition board and staff relations I.T. without I.T. nonprofit accountability Coaching nonprofit leaders Barbara Turk 30th Anniversary National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy Randall Quan tips CRE POV staff Sector Research harvard business school Advocacy case statement website, resources, announcements Interns bookkeeping strategic alliances record keeping Development Survey nonprofit ownership Hurricane Sandy House Party Stanford Social Innovation Review Nonprofit Tools Jeff Ballow Fran Barrett Karen Erdos computers Government Updates New York Community Trust Rashid Littlejohn lower Manhattan Rona Taylor civic engagement Barbara Blumenthal Funding Updates proposal writing Government News nonprofit start-ups Ero Gray Philanthropic Collaborative Harvard Kennedy School Louisa Hackett Beth Kobliner New York Huffington Post mergers cre hard times accountability publications President Obama CRE News Data NYCCCOC Albany Needs Assessment Pavitra Menon executive announcment media Michael Hickey Jean Lobell Pamela Dicent Holly Delany Cole Nonprofit News Valyrie Laedlein foundations nonprofit mergers Volunteers capacity building rockaways Board of Directors Mohan Sikka postponed event HR Without HR Bill Ryan HIV/AIDS services providers CRE Tips New York Foundation government New York Times CRE Executive Search fundraising guest blogger Featured Items Nonprofit Sustainability