News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

 

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

« Back to Blog Listings

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook CRE on LinkedIn 

News and Views  CRE RSS

Tags

Valyrie Laedlein Nonprofit Quarterly queens Randall Quan mergers Nonprofit Sustainability publications Beth Kobliner NYCCCOC announcment nonprofit mergers Pavitra Menon postponed event executive grantmakers for effective organizations proposal writing internal controls Maria Mottola Board of Directors nonprofit ownership arts Development Survey Albany RFP Fran's Corner evaluation Volunteers Louisa Hackett Karen Erdos New York City Government computers tips President Obama grantmakers Sector Research media Peter Block community New York House Party Mark Light Jeff Ballow handling the unexpected Holly Delany Cole lower Manhattan CRE Executive Search website, resources, announcements I.T. without I.T. CRE News Stanford Social Innovation Review Alliance for Nonprofit Management What is Core? Nonprofit Tools staff strategic alliances New York Times Huffington Post Featured Items bookkeeping Jean Lobell Hurricane Sandy record keeping Philanthropic Collaborative Rashid Littlejohn guest blogger civic engagement Client News United Way of NYC foundations leadership Interns government Government News collaborations NYS Budget New York Foundation accountability Government Updates nonprofit start-ups Fran Barrett Nonprofit News Coaching jobs board leadership case statement Michael Hickey harvard business school Needs Assessment Ero Gray rockaways fundraising Nonprofit Data Starved Advocacy generative Ximena Rua-Merkin Data National and Community Service nonprofit accountability nonprofit management Useful Links CRE POV HR Without HR 30th Anniversary Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative Bill Ryan Governance as Leadership Barbara Turk Harvard Kennedy School Rona Taylor Mohan Sikka hard times Barbara Blumenthal cre board and staff relations New York Community Trust National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy executive transition CRE Tips Daring to Lead IT Funding Updates nonprofit leaders MAC AIDS Fund Pamela Dicent HIV/AIDS services providers capacity building