News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

Peter Block case statement Nonprofit News Alliance for Nonprofit Management hard times capacity building Board of Directors fundraising Ximena Rua-Merkin nonprofit leaders Useful Links Louisa Hackett civic engagement Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative mergers generative Jean Lobell Karen Erdos Governance as Leadership queens cre Government Updates RFP Bill Ryan NYS Budget National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy nonprofit accountability Data grantmakers Rona Taylor Development Survey House Party Featured Items rockaways strategic alliances announcment computers jobs CRE POV harvard business school media foundations 30th Anniversary Daring to Lead proposal writing government CRE Executive Search Barbara Turk Hurricane Sandy Mohan Sikka Ero Gray Holly Delany Cole record keeping What is Core? Needs Assessment Interns Nonprofit Philanthropic Collaborative New York Times National and Community Service nonprofit ownership Barbara Blumenthal Client News I.T. without I.T. guest blogger Nonprofit Sustainability Michael Hickey arts Maria Mottola nonprofit mergers New York Foundation handling the unexpected Stanford Social Innovation Review Nonprofit Tools executive transition Randall Quan Nonprofit Quarterly staff Pavitra Menon publications Jeff Ballow Huffington Post Sector Research lower Manhattan leadership nonprofit management United Way of NYC Coaching tips MAC AIDS Fund board leadership Beth Kobliner New York Advocacy executive New York City Government President Obama bookkeeping CRE News Mark Light collaborations website, resources, announcements accountability Rashid Littlejohn evaluation board and staff relations community Harvard Kennedy School CRE Tips HR Without HR Valyrie Laedlein Data Starved grantmakers for effective organizations Volunteers Funding Updates nonprofit start-ups postponed event internal controls IT NYCCCOC HIV/AIDS services providers New York Community Trust Fran's Corner Fran Barrett Pamela Dicent Government News Albany