News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?


by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

« Back to Blog Listings

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook CRE on LinkedIn 

News and Views  CRE RSS


Daring to Lead New York Needs Assessment publications nonprofit ownership case statement civic engagement RFP Nonprofit Sustainability board leadership nonprofit management Peter Block executive foundations Holly Delany Cole Sector Research CRE Tips IT What is Core? accountability arts Development Survey computers guest blogger CRE POV fundraising Useful Links Volunteers Ximena Rua-Merkin executive transition harvard business school Philanthropic Collaborative lower Manhattan Albany queens NYCCCOC President Obama Government Updates New York Times Maria Mottola leadership staff record keeping Harvard Kennedy School grantmakers for effective organizations evaluation Valyrie Laedlein Jean Lobell Michael Hickey collaborations postponed event HIV/AIDS services providers Louisa Hackett Barbara Blumenthal National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy Jeff Ballow Governance as Leadership proposal writing HR Without HR House Party board and staff relations Nonprofit Quarterly nonprofit start-ups Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative Beth Kobliner tips Interns Featured Items mergers CRE Executive Search Karen Erdos nonprofit leaders Alliance for Nonprofit Management Nonprofit rockaways Randall Quan Board of Directors website, resources, announcements internal controls 30th Anniversary government Rashid Littlejohn Data New York Community Trust grantmakers handling the unexpected cre Funding Updates New York Foundation Advocacy Barbara Turk strategic alliances Hurricane Sandy Fran Barrett Coaching I.T. without I.T. announcment community Pamela Dicent Client News Government News Ero Gray Data Starved Nonprofit News hard times Rona Taylor jobs nonprofit mergers media Fran's Corner capacity building United Way of NYC Huffington Post Stanford Social Innovation Review CRE News MAC AIDS Fund Mark Light Nonprofit Tools Bill Ryan generative bookkeeping nonprofit accountability National and Community Service Pavitra Menon NYS Budget New York City Government Mohan Sikka