News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

grantmakers for effective organizations tips HR Without HR Funding Updates Mohan Sikka Governance as Leadership Louisa Hackett Government Updates Barbara Turk accountability Needs Assessment Hurricane Sandy Rona Taylor Interns nonprofit ownership Data Nonprofit Sustainability Peter Block NYS Budget announcment New York Times media community guest blogger record keeping Michael Hickey Nonprofit Quarterly Fran Barrett 30th Anniversary arts National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy House Party I.T. without I.T. postponed event Rashid Littlejohn case statement Useful Links executive proposal writing Valyrie Laedlein Client News Barbara Blumenthal Albany Mark Light Advocacy New York City Government government nonprofit start-ups nonprofit leaders New York Community Trust Alliance for Nonprofit Management Jean Lobell Jeff Ballow generative jobs lower Manhattan Volunteers cre President Obama Holly Delany Cole Randall Quan computers fundraising CRE Executive Search nonprofit mergers bookkeeping Nonprofit News staff mergers foundations IT nonprofit management Daring to Lead NYCCCOC Nonprofit Tools New York What is Core? Ero Gray board leadership Maria Mottola United Way of NYC Pavitra Menon board and staff relations CRE Tips Coaching Fran's Corner publications Featured Items strategic alliances Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative Data Starved queens collaborations Ximena Rua-Merkin nonprofit accountability HIV/AIDS services providers RFP leadership Karen Erdos capacity building civic engagement Harvard Kennedy School hard times Nonprofit Huffington Post Sector Research website, resources, announcements Philanthropic Collaborative evaluation CRE News Development Survey National and Community Service Government News Bill Ryan handling the unexpected Stanford Social Innovation Review Beth Kobliner New York Foundation internal controls harvard business school Board of Directors rockaways grantmakers MAC AIDS Fund Pamela Dicent executive transition CRE POV