News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views


Hurricane Sandy Rashid Littlejohn Government Updates capacity building Sector Research Jean Lobell cre New York City Government Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative Stanford Social Innovation Review Mohan Sikka National and Community Service rockaways NYS Budget bookkeeping harvard business school New York Foundation board leadership Data strategic alliances Fran Barrett Nonprofit Nonprofit News Pamela Dicent Rona Taylor CRE Tips New York Times evaluation nonprofit mergers Mark Light CRE News record keeping Daring to Lead 30th Anniversary lower Manhattan Ximena Rua-Merkin Valyrie Laedlein CRE POV grantmakers for effective organizations jobs Holly Delany Cole Needs Assessment guest blogger Nonprofit Quarterly website, resources, announcements Governance as Leadership Harvard Kennedy School Barbara Blumenthal Interns Volunteers Fran's Corner internal controls Featured Items collaborations generative Development Survey House Party foundations nonprofit leaders nonprofit management I.T. without I.T. Michael Hickey What is Core? Coaching nonprofit start-ups announcment Alliance for Nonprofit Management RFP New York Community Trust fundraising media Pavitra Menon Nonprofit Tools executive transition proposal writing Albany HIV/AIDS services providers postponed event arts nonprofit accountability handling the unexpected civic engagement MAC AIDS Fund NYCCCOC Jeff Ballow New York grantmakers Beth Kobliner Randall Quan leadership Philanthropic Collaborative nonprofit ownership Board of Directors government Funding Updates IT hard times staff computers mergers Barbara Turk National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy queens CRE Executive Search Peter Block Useful Links tips Maria Mottola Advocacy board and staff relations Bill Ryan Nonprofit Sustainability publications Data Starved executive Ero Gray case statement United Way of NYC accountability Huffington Post Government News community Karen Erdos Client News President Obama Louisa Hackett HR Without HR