News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views


What is Core? foundations Valyrie Laedlein Huffington Post CRE Tips Mark Light announcment executive Useful Links Harvard Kennedy School Governance as Leadership lower Manhattan Nonprofit Quarterly Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative community Nonprofit News arts internal controls nonprofit management nonprofit accountability Jeff Ballow HIV/AIDS services providers Development Survey collaborations capacity building Karen Erdos Michael Hickey Ero Gray Alliance for Nonprofit Management National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy nonprofit leaders Beth Kobliner New York Advocacy nonprofit start-ups grantmakers for effective organizations record keeping Rona Taylor bookkeeping tips Interns Albany mergers harvard business school hard times Bill Ryan evaluation fundraising strategic alliances CRE News Nonprofit Louisa Hackett Ximena Rua-Merkin HR Without HR Sector Research Daring to Lead United Way of NYC staff website, resources, announcements government queens generative grantmakers Maria Mottola House Party jobs Barbara Turk computers Rashid Littlejohn President Obama Volunteers board and staff relations nonprofit mergers Funding Updates 30th Anniversary New York Times Needs Assessment case statement proposal writing Jean Lobell Philanthropic Collaborative Coaching NYCCCOC Fran Barrett guest blogger Hurricane Sandy handling the unexpected rockaways media Data Starved MAC AIDS Fund IT executive transition Nonprofit Tools publications Barbara Blumenthal nonprofit ownership civic engagement Mohan Sikka I.T. without I.T. Nonprofit Sustainability Holly Delany Cole Fran's Corner Peter Block cre NYS Budget Client News Government News Board of Directors Government Updates RFP Randall Quan Pavitra Menon New York City Government New York Community Trust Pamela Dicent accountability CRE Executive Search Featured Items postponed event New York Foundation Stanford Social Innovation Review Data leadership CRE POV board leadership National and Community Service