News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

board and staff relations National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy Data Starved internal controls Sector Research Harvard Kennedy School harvard business school Maria Mottola announcment Volunteers leadership civic engagement CRE Tips capacity building Coaching handling the unexpected jobs tips Mohan Sikka accountability Ximena Rua-Merkin queens Ero Gray evaluation foundations New York Times Nonprofit Sustainability Government News 30th Anniversary government Client News Data House Party NYS Budget nonprofit start-ups collaborations Michael Hickey nonprofit management Jean Lobell guest blogger What is Core? Huffington Post Nonprofit Quarterly nonprofit leaders New York Foundation CRE Executive Search Nonprofit Tools CRE News nonprofit ownership bookkeeping HR Without HR Peter Block National and Community Service fundraising Daring to Lead nonprofit accountability Fran's Corner United Way of NYC Albany computers New York City Government Funding Updates Karen Erdos Needs Assessment President Obama website, resources, announcements Barbara Turk publications Rona Taylor Louisa Hackett Jeff Ballow Advocacy nonprofit mergers Stanford Social Innovation Review postponed event case statement arts Alliance for Nonprofit Management Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative staff Pavitra Menon New York Community Trust Interns Valyrie Laedlein lower Manhattan IT RFP I.T. without I.T. grantmakers Useful Links Nonprofit NYCCCOC HIV/AIDS services providers Fran Barrett proposal writing Mark Light Government Updates Bill Ryan mergers cre board leadership Barbara Blumenthal Nonprofit News Development Survey Hurricane Sandy New York Pamela Dicent Board of Directors Holly Delany Cole community Rashid Littlejohn hard times MAC AIDS Fund Governance as Leadership rockaways media grantmakers for effective organizations executive Randall Quan record keeping generative executive transition strategic alliances Featured Items CRE POV Philanthropic Collaborative Beth Kobliner