News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

Development Survey Government Updates 30th Anniversary National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy Ero Gray guest blogger Michael Hickey record keeping jobs New York City Government Huffington Post Mohan Sikka House Party Stanford Social Innovation Review Nonprofit Sustainability leadership Holly Delany Cole Alliance for Nonprofit Management proposal writing Fran Barrett New York rockaways HIV/AIDS services providers Hurricane Sandy What is Core? Client News board leadership President Obama community mergers nonprofit management harvard business school Useful Links Albany nonprofit ownership executive nonprofit start-ups Governance as Leadership MAC AIDS Fund Harvard Kennedy School fundraising CRE POV Needs Assessment grantmakers for effective organizations executive transition Peter Block Interns grantmakers collaborations Board of Directors Mark Light Karen Erdos case statement CRE Executive Search Jeff Ballow board and staff relations Advocacy Jean Lobell Featured Items Data Randall Quan website, resources, announcements strategic alliances Fran's Corner evaluation Pamela Dicent capacity building postponed event Daring to Lead publications New York Foundation HR Without HR Government News Ximena Rua-Merkin Rashid Littlejohn Rona Taylor tips RFP New York Community Trust government CRE Tips Nonprofit Philanthropic Collaborative nonprofit accountability Pavitra Menon nonprofit mergers Nonprofit Tools staff National and Community Service Data Starved civic engagement accountability Barbara Turk Beth Kobliner NYCCCOC nonprofit leaders bookkeeping New York Times Bill Ryan United Way of NYC I.T. without I.T. arts handling the unexpected Funding Updates Valyrie Laedlein Nonprofit News Volunteers queens computers hard times Sector Research cre foundations lower Manhattan Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative CRE News Nonprofit Quarterly media Coaching Maria Mottola internal controls Barbara Blumenthal IT generative Louisa Hackett announcment NYS Budget