News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?

by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

NYS Budget Jean Lobell Hurricane Sandy Michael Hickey record keeping announcment Valyrie Laedlein New York Community Trust Sector Research Client News jobs Advocacy publications I.T. without I.T. grantmakers for effective organizations Philanthropic Collaborative Holly Delany Cole Coaching New York City Government strategic alliances Barbara Turk nonprofit ownership NYCCCOC civic engagement Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy executive transition fundraising Nonprofit Interns generative Nonprofit Quarterly Data mergers Huffington Post nonprofit mergers guest blogger Volunteers tips Development Survey Pamela Dicent board leadership Daring to Lead National and Community Service New York Foundation CRE Executive Search handling the unexpected arts Karen Erdos Louisa Hackett Board of Directors executive postponed event Nonprofit Tools United Way of NYC cre Peter Block collaborations Mark Light President Obama nonprofit start-ups Beth Kobliner capacity building Ximena Rua-Merkin leadership Alliance for Nonprofit Management Useful Links What is Core? Bill Ryan Funding Updates bookkeeping Barbara Blumenthal HR Without HR HIV/AIDS services providers CRE Tips government Nonprofit Sustainability hard times internal controls Fran Barrett Needs Assessment proposal writing Mohan Sikka Governance as Leadership CRE POV case statement board and staff relations Maria Mottola Jeff Ballow staff harvard business school Rona Taylor nonprofit management Albany RFP evaluation community MAC AIDS Fund 30th Anniversary Government News website, resources, announcements nonprofit accountability computers House Party Pavitra Menon Randall Quan grantmakers Harvard Kennedy School lower Manhattan queens Government Updates Nonprofit News nonprofit leaders Rashid Littlejohn accountability Ero Gray New York Stanford Social Innovation Review New York Times rockaways Featured Items foundations media Data Starved IT Fran's Corner CRE News