News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

Is Evaluation an Infection?


by Louisa Hackett - Recently, a few community-based organizations, evaluators and funders gathered at the City University of New York Graduate Center to discuss, as one participant described it, the accountability regime eating us.

  In discussing how evaluation is affecting (or as some might say infecting) the nonprofit sector, speakers mentioned all the research studies that report the same obvious and well known findings: lack of childcare, healthcare, access to education, employment and transportation restrict vulnerable populations’ ability to move out of poverty.  And, even more distressing, is that funding for evaluation and research undercuts the money available for programs.  

A recent case in point is the New York City-sponsored Opportunity NYC Family rewards that paid poor people to encourage good behaviors (going to the dentist; attending school regularly) and self-sufficiency (holding down a full-time job; passing the high school Regents exam).  The program which paid out more than $14 million to over 2,500 families also cost $10.2 million to run and $9.6 million to evaluate according to the New York Times

Government and foundations interest in funding ‘evidence-based’ programs is founded on a belief that scientifically designed research methods reveal what works.  However, as the group explained, complex social problems require complex interventions and complexity can not always be easily studied like a science experiment. 

Accountability does matter.  Collecting data has the potential to improve programs.  The question becomes creating useful evaluations or feedback mechanisms to make sure programs are effective and bad programs can be improved.  As Katya Fels Smyth and Lisbeth B. Schorr point out in their paper “A Lot to Lose: A Call to Rethink What Constitutes ‘Evidence’ in Finding Social Interventions that Work,” by basing our judgments on many ways of knowing and many sources of evidence, we can avoid the false choice between relying on random assignment experiments versus relying on professions of good intentions, ideology, and a handful of anecdotes.”

How can a nonprofit respond and be equipped to explain their programs impact?  One way is for groups to take back the evaluation language and explain to funders this is how we define and measure success.  An initial step is to develop a theory of change that makes explicit the link between a program’s activities and the impact it wants to make.  Another step is to gather information, including stories that indicate progress is being made within the program’s identified domains of impact.  And finally, groups can say to those funders requesting evaluation data, “will you support our ability to gather and report evidence our program works over and above the funding for the program?” 

« Back to Blog Listings

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook CRE on LinkedIn 

News and Views  CRE RSS


Maria Mottola Barbara Blumenthal nonprofit management Holly Delany Cole Philanthropic Collaborative mergers Coaching grantmakers for effective organizations Nonprofit Tools website, resources, announcements jobs postponed event grantmakers evaluation announcment HR Without HR fundraising House Party Daring to Lead National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy queens Development Survey Featured Items cre Pavitra Menon leadership Valyrie Laedlein I.T. without I.T. Ero Gray board and staff relations executive Rashid Littlejohn Client News CRE News community foundations tips Board of Directors Nonprofit Nonprofit Quarterly Louisa Hackett Hurricane Sandy Harvard Kennedy School Useful Links Randall Quan staff Ximena Rua-Merkin What is Core? Interns Fran's Corner Needs Assessment nonprofit leaders proposal writing government Data Starved National and Community Service Nonprofit News CRE Tips President Obama generative Government News Huffington Post Pamela Dicent 30th Anniversary executive transition New York Times Barbara Turk harvard business school United Way of NYC Nonprofit Sustainability accountability Funding Updates collaborations media Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative CRE POV strategic alliances nonprofit mergers Stanford Social Innovation Review rockaways Volunteers Government Updates Bill Ryan internal controls Advocacy case statement computers NYCCCOC capacity building New York Community Trust Sector Research handling the unexpected arts New York hard times NYS Budget nonprofit accountability bookkeeping Mohan Sikka nonprofit start-ups IT HIV/AIDS services providers Albany Data Rona Taylor Karen Erdos Jeff Ballow Alliance for Nonprofit Management New York City Government New York Foundation Beth Kobliner Mark Light CRE Executive Search Peter Block RFP Michael Hickey guest blogger board leadership civic engagement Jean Lobell nonprofit ownership lower Manhattan record keeping MAC AIDS Fund Fran Barrett publications Governance as Leadership