News & Views

A blog for those interested in what affects, motivates and drives the New York City Nonprofit Sector — written by CRE’s crackerjack consulting team. We hope you use this space to share your thoughts, ask questions and engage in conversations about our city, social justice and the nonprofit sector.

What Do Invisible Nonprofits Mean For Community Leadership?

By Valyrie Laedlein, CRE Co-Director - Those of you accustomed to visiting this website know that CRE exists to support nonprofit organizations in becoming stronger and more effective in their work to fight poverty and advance social justice. So it came as a bit of a shocker to hear the director of a foundation who is a significant supporter of social services and nonprofit capacity building say in a meeting last week that nonprofit organizations are becoming increasingly “invisible.”

He explained that the New York City Mayor’s office and City agencies – and for that matter many private foundations – focus on contracting for programs. That is to say, programs delivered to best effect at the best price. What makes for an effective program, managed at peak efficiency, is not the concern of public or most private funders. Hence, specific interest in, or concern for, the organizations that deliver those programs is obviated.

My colleagues and I at CRE haven’t quite embraced this point of view yet. We’d certainly affirm that unless an organization is capable of delivering a program that gets results and can do so efficiently, it shouldn’t be funded. But we also recognize that organizations operating with extremely slim margins, high levels of accountability, delays in government reimbursements, and declining levels of public and private support, are often compromised in their ability to do so – and placed at serious risk of shutting their doors. I’ve been engaged in the process of supporting one agency’s board of directors as it decided to end operations, and yesterday I met with another board who is debating the same question of whether it can continue to operate as an independent entity or not. A major funder of theirs has essentially yanked support because it feels the organization is too focused and there’s not potential to “go to scale.”

Now what happens?

Should we be content that those programs fold, or at best that a large city-wide agency comes to absorb programming? Does community leadership of programs and organizations matter, or can any well-run, scaled organization take over a program and deliver what the community needs, regardless of where the agency is based or who leads it?

I worry – no, actually, I’m devastated - about what I see happening among CRE’s clients. The mindset of scarcity has consumed civil society and constraints in available resources to build that society have contributed to a set of assumptions now held by government and a distinct number of private funders that scale must trump all. It seems no longer to matter that an organization is by the community and for the community – or that the rise of community-driven leaders and institutions represents a significant stage in the process of community development.

In a city of communities – as defined by geography, affiliation, ethnicity and other - community institutions DO matter. If, and when, those institutions become invisible, we will have taken a giant step backwards and begun to undermine our progress in building community self-determination, which has been a bedrock of movement-building since the 1960s.

This moment seems to require new ways of thinking about our institutions and a new willingness to reconfigure them to retain community ownership. Like never before, boards and nonprofit leaders need to think about forging new relationships with similarly-situated partners – combining forces to build and maintain viable community-led organizations that will retain the qualities of and a commitment to community voice, direction, and self-determination. This is hard work that will challenge nonprofit leaders and their fundamental assumptions about defending their organizations. It will require that we shift our paradigm to focus on a goal that’s greater than preserving any single organization, in the interest of assuring the success and sustainability of key organizations that will be institutions capable of making change happen through services and advocacy for the community and by the community.

For more information on how CRE can help your nonprofit to remain sustainable in these tough economic times, please check out our services.

Find us on:  CRE on Twitter CRE on Facebook  

News and Views

Tags

New York Community Trust RFP queens Client News Ero Gray President Obama Bill Ryan board and staff relations CRE News media Daring to Lead Governance as Leadership Harvard Kennedy School Barbara Turk nonprofit mergers Data Starved record keeping Rashid Littlejohn rockaways Useful Links Stanford Social Innovation Review Fran's Corner CRE Executive Search Barbara Blumenthal Pavitra Menon cre Beth Kobliner Needs Assessment Fran Barrett staff lower Manhattan Nonprofit News internal controls leadership Louisa Hackett Nonprofit Quarterly Jean Lobell government nonprofit start-ups announcment Jeff Ballow Board of Directors Mark Light bookkeeping fundraising NYCCCOC HR Without HR MAC AIDS Fund Sector Research Hurricane Sandy Nonprofit Tools Philanthropic Collaborative accountability case statement Rona Taylor Albany nonprofit ownership Interns NYS Budget Advocacy harvard business school tips National Committee of Responsive Philanthropy strategic alliances Nonprofit foundations generative computers National and Community Service New York Times collaborations HIV/AIDS services providers Maria Mottola Government News I.T. without I.T. jobs Mohan Sikka civic engagement United Way of NYC Funding Updates Ximena Rua-Merkin Huffington Post arts publications nonprofit accountability evaluation Peter Block What is Core? Neighborhood Based Capacity Building Initiative 30th Anniversary community Alliance for Nonprofit Management capacity building guest blogger mergers Michael Hickey Nonprofit Sustainability hard times grantmakers for effective organizations grantmakers New York City Government New York Randall Quan website, resources, announcements Coaching board leadership handling the unexpected Holly Delany Cole CRE POV Data Development Survey Volunteers nonprofit leaders executive transition proposal writing Valyrie Laedlein Karen Erdos nonprofit management Featured Items executive CRE Tips House Party Government Updates Pamela Dicent New York Foundation postponed event IT